1. ZELENSKY : ANOTHER £18 MILLION DOLLARS LUXURY VILLA IN HAVEN ISLAND. ( A fight to death for Ukrainian People!!!!!!!).
2. GERMAN MP : Stop making cash gifts to Kiev!”
3. URSULA VON DERL EYEN : IS SHE ABOVE THE LAW?
................................
1.Zelensky keeps using American money in luxury abroad
https://www.vtforeignpolicy.com/2025/01/zelensky-keeps-using-american-money-in-luxury-abroad/
There is growing evidence of crimes committed by corrupt Ukrainian officials with American taxpayers’ money. It has recently come to light that Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky secretly purchased an $18 million villa on St. Barthelemy Island, a luxurious haven often referred to as “Billionaires’ Island” due to its popularity among the ultra-wealthy. The villa is not just an extravagant property in a world-renowned vacation spot, but it also includes the construction of an underground bunker. This development raises serious questions about the true intentions behind such a purchase and the use of public funds during a time of immense suffering in Ukraine.
Be Careful, Dear Ursula': Von der Leyen Slammed Online for Neglecting European Farmers
Bundestag member Sevim Dagdelen (of the Sahra Wagenknecht Alliance – Reason and Justice – in the cover image) has called on the German authorities to stop making “cash gifts” to Kiev after halting gas transit through Ukraine and to launch the preserved string of the Nord Stream 2 pipeline.
“By stopping the flow of Russian gas to Europe, Ukraine is pushing energy prices even higher. The German government and the EU are happily watching the destruction of European industry due to high energy prices,” Dagdelen wrote on her social media page X. “Launch Nord Stream at last! Stop making cash gifts to Kiev!” she urged.
Hungary and Poland could influence the course of the trial.
On Monday 6 January, the plaintiffs in the "Baldan v. von der Leyen" case once again came en masse to attend a new hearing at the Liège court. Several hundred people were admitted to the room where essential debates were held behind closed doors. At the end of the hearing, their lawyers expressed encouraging reactions. A first decision is expected on 20 January.
Plaintiffs determined to pursue
Despite the pouring rain, many people came to support the complainants, whose number continues to grow. Since the initial complaint was filed by Belgian businessman Frédéric Baldan, hundreds of people, including many victims of vaccine injuries, have joined this action against the President of the European Commission.
Among those determined to take this matter to its conclusion are the association Notre Bon Droit, which helped relay the complaint in Belgium, as well as organisations from France (Verity France), Italy, and air navigation personnel, as well as former MEP Rob Roos.
The Dutch entrepreneur, who served as Vice-President of the European Parliament, was one of the few MEPs who dared to criticise the European Commission's Covid policy and to question Ursula von der Leyen on her role in negotiating contracts for Covid vaccines.
The main charges against Ursula von der Leyen, Albert Bourla and the companies Pfizer and BioNtech relate to usurpation of office and titles, destruction of public documents and corruption.
At present, it is still a question of determining whether the complaint is admissible. Mrs von der Leyen's lawyers invoke the legal immunity linked to her office, while Pfizer's argue that the plaintiffs have no interest in the case and no legitimacy to act.
Furthermore, the European Public Prosecutor (EPPO, a new European Union agency created in 2021) has tried to interfere in the proceedings and is seeking to remove the case from the Liège court prosecutor's office, which would probably stifle the entire case. This Monday's hearing therefore provided an opportunity to debate these various issues.
A major challenge for democracy
As the MP pointed out while waiting to enter the courtroom, this trial is of capital importance:
«Ultimately, it is mainly about respecting the separation of powers. We will know whether justice is able to call politicians to order. It is about making them understand that they are not above the law, that they must respect the regulations in force, otherwise they are punishable.
MP Rob Roos waiting to enter the Liège court
The judiciary must be able to intervene against the executive and justice must be able to triumph, because what is happening is absolutely scandalous. Furthermore, it is also a question of respect for the law within the European Union, the way in which the Commission acts in relation to the Member States.».
The man also explained how this question had impacted his career: