Synopsis : if everything is moving around and for a central point
then the concept of coincidence seize to exist.
Coincidence is a 3d concept,which exists only in linear-time- space continuum - lacking spherical perception of things
which exist only in circular time. In the Now time.
This concetric orbit from one center to another ,with certain non-
final finalities,serves the ascension process of all creatures within
Cosmic creation of the Oneness.This evolutionary process to the Universe center,and then around the master Universe center,has the final finality around the Central Universe of HAVONA and THE PARADISE ISLAND.
This evolutionary process is interrupted or cancelled by negative
energy fields,created by the adversaries on planets which were
captured and kept hostages for millennia,creating quarantine status
and separation from Oneness.
A non-final finality is the causal effect of the unbalance bettween
positive and negative energies,which are manifested in certain
linear timing, which triggers an upwards or downwards
process.The extent of the results is depending on the unbalance
between the +pole and the -pole.
The energies dynamics can not ,either be predicted or controlled,
where the adversaries or evil parasites are in charge and can manipulate the energy grid.
When these stage of finality is unfolding,and manifested in reality as certain events,there should be only quides with the mission to assist and provide help....
The author
The concept of finality
( Daniela Lupo )
The finalistic conception prevail in ancient and recent metaphysics is the Aristotelian one. The two theses of Finalism are integral parts of Aristotelian metaphysics. On the one hand, Aristotle states that “all that is by nature exists for an end” and identifies the end with the same substance “or form, or reason of being of the thing“. On the other hand, he believes that the universe is subordinated to a single end that is God himself, on which the order and the movement of the universe itself depends.
Aristotle defends the causality of the end against the thesis that he calls the “necessity” where things do not happen in view of their best result, but sometimes they are the accidental result of necessity or chance, according to the Empedocles doctrine. Hence for Aristotle it is not the case to explain nature, as the finalism is also valid for the inorganic world where everything, if not impeded, goes towards its “natural place”.
Teleology (from the Greek τέλος (télos), end, purpose and λόγος (lógos), speech, thought) is the philosophical doctrine of finalism, which admits the causality of the end not only in the common voluntary activity of rational man directed to the realization of a purpose, but also in those involuntary and unconscious actions that nevertheless accomplish an end. So the end, the final purpose, is both the result of the total organization of the world and that of individual events.
The term finalism seems to date back to Christian Wolff who used it in his Philosophia rationalis sive logic (1728), in relation to “that part of the natural philosophy that explains the ends of things”.
Even without this term, the conception of finality goes back to ancient Greek philosophy as opposed to the philosophy of determinism of the natural philosophers. The doctrine of finalism implies two theses: 1) the world is organized in view of an end; 2) the explanation of every event of the world consists in inducing the end towards which the event is directed.
According to the testimony of Plato and Aristotle the first ancient thinkers to assume the causality of the end was Anaxagoras who spoke of an ordering entity (intellect) Nous (see also Neoplatonism) to which “all separate and distinct things belong, all of them are present in itself … and it [puts] them in order. ”
