Monday, July 15, 2013

Obama’s Next Major Crime On Humanity In His Attempt to Establish the NWO

Instead of a commend

 

 

Sanat Kamara says . . . 

Before you decided to become a human this time the dark and light wars were coming to a momentous clash. When this occurred there was a major conflict on the planet of Orion also. In this dynamic Orion sent agents to check out man's continents as another land for their own. In their desire to control this civilization they became mixed race bodies with reptilian brains. Many became Christian zealots. Some went into politics. Some became military officers. And one or two thousand came as an added bonus to lead others to these leaders, to be governed. Military officers who lead with a mandate from an alien government are deciding your fate now – if you allow it to continue. Currently they intend to wipe out all Muslim led countries to divert attention from the other games they are capturing man's choices with.

Political observers notice the change in attitude the President of the United States now has. Can you agree with him? Why not? May we offer this explanation: On Orion he was targeted to be used as their greatest tool for manipulation of humans in all countries of the Earth in order to produce total chaos and completely eliminate man's ability to care for one another. When the dark days come they intend to invade – a complete takeover of what is left.

Please don't be afraid to ascend – it is the interference that is needed to destroy the takeover they have designed for Earth. In the days to come, Orion must be deterred from this takeover so this planet remains available for the creation of the New Earth.

Please care and concern yourself with this awareness as you make your choice about ascension.

I am the World Creator in one aspect of the creation's design.
Sanat Kamara
http://mastersandmankind.blogspot.com/2011/07/sanat-kamara-says.html

 

Obama’s Next Major Crime On Humanity In His Attempt to Establish the NWO

 




by Georgi Stankov, July 14, 2013
www.stankovuniversallaw.com
There is a clear-cut methodology in the current dark policy of the greatest living war criminal in recent human history, the Non-American citizen and usurper of the US democratic power – the human monster and stooge of the dark hidden government of the US cabal, Barack Hussein Obama II.
Since he has been elected the first time – his election for a second term was fraudulent and thus a capital treason against the USA – he is governing the United States with illegitimate executive orders, which he does not even finds necessary to publish any more as he does not want to reveal his dark intentions to establish an unlimited terror regime through military dictatorship in North America and then throughout the whole world.
This blackest president, within and outside, thus embodies the entire evil, which the already eliminated former Orion / Reptilian Empire on the present upper 4D earth, on which we now dwell, has inherited to the ascending humanity in the embodiment of its political human minions, so that they can participate in the last human drama of cosmic proportion, before about 800 million human beings will ascend together with Gaia to higher dimensions. While the rest, approximately 5.2 billion soulless empty holographic human images, including those of the dark cabal on power, such as Obama and his criminal Co. will be for ever extinguished from this timeline and their soul fragments removed to the lower catastrophic 4D earths, which are now in turmoil and experience the NWO and a huge devastation after the MPR. These developments in the newly created seven 4D earths of the changed scenario of ascension in May 2013 have been extensively discussed on our website in the last several weeks.
The signs that we are on the cusp of the final desperate act of evil, planned by the dark ruling cabal to escape from the complete siege of light coming from the Source through the web of light of the PAT, are exponentially growing in the last days. I can only recommend you to keep a vigilant and open eye on all these processes that can very quickly culminate into a huge global catastrophe that will however not affect any of the ascending human entities, but only the perpetrators of this crime. This is the divine plan for this planet prior to its ascension as the Elohim have recently confirmed.
Read very careful this article in the Guardian that is a direct vintage from the huge revelations of the American hero Snowden given to the famous journalist Glenn Greenwald.
______________________________________________________________

Obama orders US to draw up overseas target list for cyber-attacks

by  and 
Guardian.co.uk
Exclusive: Top-secret directive steps up offensive cyber capabilities to ‘advance US objectives around the world’
• Read the secret presidential directive here
Link to a Video on how Obama is lying abouit his intentions
Barack Obama has ordered his senior national security and intelligence officials to draw up a list of potential overseas targets for US cyber-attacks, a top secret presidential directive obtained by the Guardian reveals.
The 18-page Presidential Policy Directive 20, issued in October last year but never published, states that what it calls Offensive Cyber Effects Operations (OCEO) “can offer unique and unconventional capabilities to advance US national objectives around the world with little or no warning to the adversary or target and with potential effects ranging from subtle to severely damaging”.
It says the government will “identify potential targets of national importance where OCEO can offer a favorable balance of effectiveness and risk as compared with other instruments of national power”.


The directive also contemplates the possible use of cyber actions inside the US, though it specifies that no such domestic operations can be conducted without the prior order of the president, except in cases of emergency.
The aim of the document was “to put in place tools and a framework to enable government to make decisions” on cyber actions, a senior administration official told the Guardian.
The administration published some declassified talking points from the directive in January 2013, but those did not mention the stepping up of America’s offensive capability and the drawing up of a target list.
Obama’s move to establish a potentially aggressive cyber warfare doctrine will heighten fears over the increasing militarization of the internet.
The directive’s publication comes as the president plans to confront his Chinese counterpart Xi Jinping at a summit in California on Friday over alleged Chinese attacks on western targets.
Even before the publication of the directive, Beijing had hit back against US criticism, with a senior official claiming to have “mountains of data” on American cyber-attacks he claimed were every bit as serious as those China was accused of having carried out against the US.
Presidential Policy Directive 20 defines OCEO as “operations and related programs or activities … conducted by or on behalf of the United States Government, in or through cyberspace, that are intended to enable or produce cyber effects outside United States government networks.”
Asked about the stepping up of US offensive capabilities outlined in the directive, a senior administration official said: “Once humans develop the capacity to build boats, we build navies. Once you build airplanes, we build air forces.”
The official added: “As a citizen, you expect your government to plan for scenarios. We’re very interested in having a discussion with our international partners about what the appropriate boundaries are.”
The document includes caveats and precautions stating that all US cyber operations should conform to US and international law, and that any operations “reasonably likely to result in significant consequences require specific presidential approval”.
The document says that agencies should consider the consequences of any cyber-action. They include the impact on intelligence-gathering; the risk of retaliation; the impact on the stability and security of the internet itself; the balance of political risks versus gains; and the establishment of unwelcome norms of international behaviour.
Among the possible “significant consequences” are loss of life; responsive actions against the US; damage to property; serious adverse foreign policy or economic impacts.
The US is understood to have already participated in at least one major cyber attack, the use of the Stuxnet computer worm targeted on Iranian uranium enrichment centrifuges, the legality of which has been the subject of controversy. US reports citing high-level sources within the intelligence services said the US and Israel were responsible for the worm.
In the presidential directive, the criteria for offensive cyber operations in the directive is not limited to retaliatory action but vaguely framed as advancing “US national objectives around the world”.
The revelation that the US is preparing a specific target list for offensive cyber-action is likely to reignite previously raised concerns of security researchers and academics, several of whom have warned that large-scale cyber operations could easily escalate into full-scale military conflict.
Sean Lawson, assistant professor in the department of communication at the University of Utah, argues: “When militarist cyber rhetoric results in use of offensive cyber attack it is likely that those attacks will escalate into physical, kinetic uses of force.”
An intelligence source with extensive knowledge of the National Security Agency’s systems told the Guardian the US complaints again China were hypocritical, because America had participated in offensive cyber operations and widespread hacking – breaking into foreign computer systems to mine information.
Provided anonymity to speak critically about classified practices, the source said: “We hack everyone everywhere. We like to make a distinction between us and the others. But we are in almost every country in the world.”
The US likes to haul China before the international court of public opinion for “doing what we do every day”, the source added.
One of the unclassified points released by the administration in January stated: “It is our policy that we shall undertake the least action necessary to mitigate threats and that we will prioritize network defense and law enforcement as preferred courses of action.”
The full classified directive repeatedly emphasizes that all cyber-operations must be conducted in accordance with US law and only as a complement to diplomatic and military options. But it also makes clear how both offensive and defensive cyber operations are central to US strategy.
Under the heading “Policy Reviews and Preparation”, a section marked “TS/NF” – top secret/no foreign – states: “The secretary of defense, the DNI[Director of National Intelligence], and the director of the CIA … shall prepare for approval by the president through the National Security Advisor a plan that identifies potential systems, processes and infrastructure against which the United States should establish and maintain OCEO capabilities…” The deadline for the plan is six months after the approval of the directive.
The directive provides that any cyber-operations “intended or likely to produce cyber effects within the United States” require the approval of the president, except in the case of an “emergency cyber action”. When such an emergency arises, several departments, including the department of defense, are authorized to conduct such domestic operations without presidential approval.
Obama further authorized the use of offensive cyber attacks in foreign nations without their government’s consent whenever “US national interests and equities” require such nonconsensual attacks. It expressly reserves the right to use cyber tactics as part of what it calls “anticipatory action taken against imminent threats”.
The directive makes multiple references to the use of offensive cyber attacks by the US military. It states several times that cyber operations are to be used only in conjunction with other national tools and within the confines of law.
When the directive was first reported, lawyers with the Electronic Privacy Information Center filed a Freedom of Information Act request for it to be made public. The NSA, in a statement, refused to disclose the directive on the ground that it was classified.
In January, the Pentagon announced a major expansion of its Cyber Command Unit, under the command of General Keith Alexander, who is also the director of the NSA. That unit is responsible for executing both offensive and defensive cyber operations.
Earlier this year, the Pentagon publicly accused China for the first time of being behind attacks on the US. The Washington Post reported last month that Chinese hackers had gained access to the Pentagon’s most advanced military programs.
The director of national intelligence, James Clapper, identified cyber threats in general as the top national security threat.
Obama officials have repeatedly cited the threat of cyber-attacks to advocate new legislation that would vest the US government with greater powers to monitor and control the internet as a means of guarding against such threats.
One such bill currently pending in Congress, the Cyber Intelligence Sharing and Protection Act (Cispa), has prompted serious concerns from privacy groups, who say that it would further erode online privacy while doing little to enhance cyber security.
In a statement, Caitlin Hayden, national security council spokeswoman, said: “We have not seen the document the Guardian has obtained, as they did not share it with us. However, as we have already publicly acknowledged, last year the president signed a classified presidential directive relating to cyber operations, updating a similar directive dating back to 2004. This step is part of the administration’s focus on cybersecurity as a top priority. The cyber threat has evolved, and we have new experiences to take into account.
“This directive establishes principles and processes for the use of cyber operations so that cyber tools are integrated with the full array of national security tools we have at our disposal. It provides a whole-of-government approach consistent with the values that we promote domestically and internationally as we have previously articulated in the International Strategy for Cyberspace.
“This directive will establish principles and processes that can enable more effective planning, development, and use of our capabilities. It enables us to be flexible, while also exercising restraint in dealing with the threats we face. It continues to be our policy that we shall undertake the least action necessary to mitigate threats and that we will prioritize network defense and law enforcement as the preferred courses of action. The procedures outlined in this directive are consistent with the US Constitution, including the president’s role as commander in chief, and other applicable law and policies.”